Scott Peterson

I've been keeping tabs on this story ever since it became popular. I knew Amber Frey was going to be a key witness after hearing she recorded telephone coversations between her and Peterson. Lately the news has been playing some of this recordings and from what I've heard, this guy is guilty.

So what do you guys think? Guilty or Not Guilty

The tapes clearly show that the guy is a lying bitch. He murdered his wife, prolly had help in it to like the cops are saying now.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/08/26/peterson.witness.ap/index.html

Fry the bastard.
_________________
For with what measure you measure it will be measured to you.

Innocent till proven guilty
_________________
I am your mom and I just took you to school in the car of pain.

PRESUMED innocent until proven guilty.
_________________
consume

Four score and seven years ago...
_________________
For with what measure you measure it will be measured to you.

Despite wrote: PRESUMED innocent until proven guilty.

dR.Jester wrote: Guilty until Proven Innocent. Welcome to the United States.

I'm sure theres an essay out there on the effects of 19th-21st century media/press on justice and the outcomes of criminal trials compaired to those before television and radio media were so prevelant. Would be interresting reading. I think it would read something like "King said 'Guilty' without hearing any facts or solely based on personal opinion. Off came his/her head".
_________________
For with what measure you measure it will be measured to you.

It only works that way if you believe that shit. If I ever get on a jury I'm gonna deadlock the sonofabitch unless there is no reasonable doubt.
_________________
I am your mom and I just took you to school in the car of pain.

i say zap the motherfucker, i think he did it, and killing a pregnant woman is fucking bullshit. slowly dissect him, keeping him alive as long as possible, plz.

amber frey is kinda cute tho

Thinkin he did and knowing he did is 2 separate things tho. From my understanding of the case, there are no solid ties to Peterson. Almost all of the evidence is circumstantial.
_________________
I am your mom and I just took you to school in the car of pain.

Breaky wrote: Innocent till proven guilty

Breaky wrote: Thinkin he did and knowing he did is 2 separate things tho. From my understanding of the case, there are no solid ties to Peterson. Almost all of the evidence is circumstantial.

Breaky wrote: Thinkin he did and knowing he did is 2 separate things tho....

I think yer getting too far away from the discussion there.

The fact that a man can be happy about his wife's murder doesn't make him the murderer.

Also, if you or I were cheating on our pregnant wives and planned to leave them, how would we act? Would we sell our homes? Seeing as you or I would probably never do something like that, we can't assume that the way he was acting was suspicious given the circumstances.
_________________
I am your mom and I just took you to school in the car of pain.

The jurors too have their own values and beliefs just like every free thinkin individual on the planet. How is it any diferent than with them? They will believe what is comming from the more credible source, and if neither side is "credible enough" to cause the 12 jurors to all believe the same thing, then its hung. IMO this guy has lost all credibility with his lying to family/friends/police and his other suspicious activity and the information I have heard from the prosecuting side is credible to me. After all this thread is about YOUR OPINION not the merrits of the case or the functionality of the justice system. If you opion defaults back to "innocent until proven guilty" then you are either too poorly informed on this case to base an opinion on the subject (which is fine and probably the right thing to do) or you dont wish to.

The only one caviot to my opinion is that I have heard all information about this case from the media who tend to spin things to better their sales. So, although informed, my opinion may be totally wrong.
_________________
For with what measure you measure it will be measured to you.

Just because one is a liar doesn't mean that they pulled the trigger. If there's no physical evidence then there's no physical evidence.

Opinions aside, I may think he killed her. But unless I hear some proof other than him coming across as being a worthless guy then there's litte to prove he actually killed her.

What I'm trying to say is, there is nothing to come forward to put his charges past a reasonable doubt. If they are not past that, then their should be no way to convict this man.
_________________
I am your mom and I just took you to school in the car of pain.

G'damn movies these days. Too many of them educating crooks on how to get rid of Forensic Evidence that would tie them to a crime.

Another reason I find him guilty is because detectives seized his computer and found him researching ocean currents in the area that he dumped Laci's body.

He could have had someone else kill her and dump the body tho... making his charge conspiracy
_________________
I am your mom and I just took you to school in the car of pain.

I dont know if the dude did it or not... but the chick he cheated on his wife with is fucking HAWT!!

Scott Peterson proved one thing.... beautiful peices of snatch can make guys do almost anything....


_________________
"You can drink a shy girl crazy, you can drink 'till that good girl sins.. you can even drink an ugly girl pretty, but you cant drink a fat girl thin" -Jeff Daniels

“Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made,” Otto von Bismarck